Once again rivers and streams are under threat from attempts to weaken water pollution permits.
Governor Baker reintroduced a bill opposed by environmentalists last legislative session that would allow Massachusetts to take over the water pollution permitting program from U.S. EPA. Under the federal Clean Water Act, EPA currently regulates discharges of stormwater, wastewater and industrial pollution into our waterways. The governor’s bill would enable the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) to assume “primacy” for issuing these permits, known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, or NPDES, permits.
Charles River Watershed Association, the Massachusetts Rivers Alliance and other environmental groups oppose this bill because it will provide no environmental benefit and cost MA taxpayers millions of dollars each year. MassDEP is also already struggling to perform core monitoring, assessment, reporting and research on water quality across the state.
Clean rivers foster recreation and support wildlife
Why we oppose the delegation of the NPDES program to the Commonwealth
- MassDEP is severely underfunded and lacks the capacity to take on a new highly specialized program. In the past decade funding cuts and reductions in staffing have left MassDEP struggling to do more with less. The Boston Globe reported last year that agency funding and staff cuts have led to a steep decline in enforcement of environmental laws. MassDEP’s current water programs have suffered from these budget cuts.
- Administering this program will cost the state upwards of $4.7 million annually. A 2013 study by MassDEP estimated the program cost at $10 million annually. Because the governor’s bill does not provide a dedicated source of funding for this new program, the state legislature would need to appropriate funding every year. There is no reason to expect the pattern of cuts to MassDEP’s budget to change, leaving our water resources vulnerable to more pollution.
- EPA has done a great job of protecting our water since the 1970's. EPA provides this program to Massachusetts courtesy of all U.S. taxpayers.
NPDES delegation is forever
Perhaps you are asking yourself, "Couldn’t Massachusetts could do a better job protecting our streams and rivers now that EPA is under attack?” However, Massachusetts water programs are already weak due to state budget cuts and MassDEP lacks the trained staff to takeover the NPDES program. In contrast, EPA has a solid track record of administering this program. The current federal administration in Washington is temporary, but NPDES primacy, once granted, is forever. This legislation is not in response to the current political situation—Governor Baker previously introduced this bill in April of 2016.
We need to "Fit it First"!
CRWA advocates for a "fix it first" approach to water quality protection in Massachusetts. We support legislation filed by Rep. Dave Rogers, Cambridge (H. 2139) that would task the state’s Water Resources Commission with conducting a “gap analysis” to assess how well MassDEP is carrying out its existing responsibilities under the Clean Water Act, and what would be required (and the cost) for us to have a strong state program. Until MassDEP has the funding and other resources to perform its water quality monitoring, assessment, reporting, standard-setting, science, water pollution control plan development, and compliance and enforcement responsibilities, it is premature to add a new permitting program.
Where does the bill go next?
The bill, An Act to enable the Commonwealth's administration of the Massachusetts Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (H. 2777) has been referred to the joint committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture (ENRA). By February 7th, 2018, ENRA will decide whether to report the bill out to the Legislature for a vote or to send the bill to study for further research. We need your help to tell ENRA that they should oppose this legislation.
Please call or email the ENRA Committee Chairs (Senator Anne Gobi and Representative William Pignatelli) and watershed legislators on the committee (Senator Michael Rush and Representative Christine Barber). See below for a sample phone script and a full list of all ENRA members.
Thank you in advance. Your voice really does matter!
Sample Phone Script
Below is a sample script for your phone calls. You may also refer to the the talking points above.
“Hello, my name is _____________ and I live in ______________, Massachusetts. I am calling to ask that Representative/Senator _____________ oppose House Bill 2777, An Act to enable the Commonwealth’s administration of the Massachusetts Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. I am worried that this will hurt water quality in Massachusetts. MassDEP does not have the resources or expertise to take on this program, and I object to the cost to MA taxpayers. Thank you for your consideration.”
Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture (ENRA)
- Honorable Anne Gobi (D-Spencer), Chair of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture (617-722-1540)
- Honorable William Pignatelli (D-Lenox), Chair of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture (617-722-2210)
- Senator Michael Rush (D-West Roxbury) (617-722-1348)
- Senator Jamie Eldridge (D-Acton) (617-722-1120)
- Senator Julian Cyr (D-Truro) (617-722-1570)
- Senator Ryan Fattman (D-Webster) (617-722-1420)
- Representative RoseLee Vincent (D-Revere) (617-722-2210)
- Representative Thomas Petrolati (D-Ludlow) (617-722-2255)
- Representative Robert Koczera (D-New Bedford) (617-722-2582)
- Representative Mary Keefe (D-Worcester) (617-722-2210)
- Representative John Velis (D-Westfield) (617-722-2877)
- Representative Christine Barber (D-Somerville) (617-722-2210)
- Representative Dylan Fernandes (D-Falmouth) (617-722-2430)
- Representative Jack Lewis (D-Framingham) (617-722-2460)
- Representative Donald Berthiaume (R-Spencer) (617-722-2090)
- Representative James Kelcourse (R-Amesbury) (617-722-2130)